Blog Posts

How Democracies Start to Break

Slowly, then all at once — a guest post by Paul Edward Robinson

In my previous post, I talked about competitive authoritarianism—a system that looks democratic but is actually rigged in favor of those in power. But here’s the kicker: most of these regimes don’t start as dictatorships. They start as democracies that get chipped away piece by piece.

Leaders who undermine democracy often use the very institutions meant to protect it. They don’t storm in with tanks—they tweak the rules, pressure the courts, and flood the media with propaganda until real opposition becomes nearly impossible.

So, how does this play out in real life? Here are some red flags that a country might be shifting toward competitive authoritarianism:

Weaponizing the legal system – Opposition leaders get investigated, sued, or arrested over technicalities. Not outright repression, just enough to keep them tied up in court instead of running for office.

Controlling the media – Instead of banning independent journalism, these regimes buy up media outlets, pressure advertisers, or drown out criticism with state-sponsored news. Citizens still think they have free media, but what they see is tightly managed.

Elections that are “free” but not “fair” – Sure, people can vote. But the rules get changed just enough to make it impossible for opposition parties to compete—gerrymandering, voter suppression, or last-minute changes to election laws.

Using state resources for political gain – Government funds go toward helping the ruling party campaign. Public institutions (police, tax authorities) start targeting critics while looking the other way when allies bend the law.

Dismantling checks and balances – Courts, watchdog agencies, and legislatures get packed with loyalists who won’t challenge the government. Over time, accountability disappears.

The most dangerous part? This happens gradually. Many people don’t even realize their democracy is fading until it’s too late.

So, how do we protect democracy? By paying attention. By speaking up when these patterns start appearing. And by remembering that democracy isn’t just about elections—it’s about a system that allows real competition, real accountability, and real choice.

Today on Substack

Some good columns you may wish to read:

On Hopium Chronicles (both text and video), Simon Rosenberg asks for Democratic Party leadership to pen a “Letter to America” loudly stating what the Trump / Musk administration is doing — Trump-Musk Are Committing Crimes, Tearing Up The Constitution, Betraying The Country – And Dems Need To Say So, Loudly

On Wonkette, Robyn Pennacchia discusses double-standards in MAGA Outraged Florida AG Investigating Admitted Human Trafficker/Rapist Andrew Tate. Meanwhile, Evan Hurst discusses Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s reduced position in Oh No! Trump Is Ignoring Marco Rubio And He Is So Upset! Oh No!

Robert Reich discusses Elon Musk’s take on Social Security in The biggest Ponzi scheme in history.

Dr. Zachary Rubin suggests techniques for productive discussions with ideologically-locked people in A guide to addressing vaccine hesitancy (these techniques are likely more-broadly useful, beyond just medical topics).

You, too, can buy a piece of President Trump

That is, if you have a few million dollars to spend.

While everybody’s been distracted by Trump’s record-length falsehood-stuffed speech to Congress, most of the national media has missed some recent reporting by Wired. The bottom line is that Trump is hosting (or, at least, starring at) fund raising events — not that these are campaign fund raisers, obviously. No, the money’s supposedly being raised for his future presidential library — that, for a man who famously does not read.

The price of admission is a bit steep, though. If you want a private dinner with Trump at Mar-a-Lago, it’ll set you back a cool $5 million. But maybe you’re a wanna-be tycoon of more-limited means — a “group setting” dinner will set you back a mere $1 million.

Not that this is influence peddling, of course.

The original Wired article is here (behind paywall), or here (via 12ft.io).

Why Some Democracies Aren’t Really Democracies

A guest post by Paul Edward Robinson

We like to think of democracy as a clear-cut system—either you have free and fair elections, or you don’t. But what if I told you there’s a gray area?

In The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism (PDF, free download), Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way explain how some governments appear democratic on the surface but are actually rigged to keep those in power from ever losing.

They call this competitive authoritarianism—a system in which opposition parties exist, elections are held, and the media operates, but everything is stacked against real political competition. Think of it as a game in which one team owns the referees, controls the scoreboard, and rewrites the rules as they go.

These regimes use subtle, legal means to tilt the playing field—harassing opposition leaders with lawsuits, controlling state media, or tweaking election laws just enough to ensure the ruling party stays in power. Unlike full-blown dictatorships, they can’t just jail opponents outright (without consequences), but they don’t have to play fair either.

The scary part is that this isn’t just a phenomenon in weak states or failed democracies. It happens in places that were once solidly democratic but started sliding toward authoritarian tactics, eroding checks and balances over time.

So, next time you hear about an election that seems “free” but not quite “fair,” remember—real democracy isn’t just about voting. It’s about competition that actually gives people a real choice.